Questionable Governance Reforms for Penn State Board of Trustees


The board is considering a change to its standing orders that would allow for the removal of a trustee who violates his or her fiduciary duty or the expectations of board membership.

For instance, board members will be expected to support board decisions and not speak out against them. They will be prohibited from acting on his or her own behalf. And they will need to fulfill their donation pledges to Penn State on a timely basis.

When Lubrano heard on Friday the proposed changes, which originated in a governance committee, he asked if these were being dubbed the “Lubrano rule.”

Trustee Linda Strumpf appeared to give Lubrano a cross look, and she mouthed something at the same time as her gesture, but it was not clear what it was.

Lubrano said he wanted all the trustees held to the same standards.

Lubrano also brought up the idea of requiring trustees to go through criminal background checks, something the university implemented as one of Louis Freeh’s 119 recommendations.

The governance reforms were brought up during Friday’s board meeting for a fuller discussion by all 32 trustees. Lubrano was the only one who made comments.

James Broadhurst, the governance committee chairman, will head to Harrisburg on Monday to testify before a Senate committee hearing about the reforms.

Shame on Paul Suhey and Stephanie Deviney


Penn State trustee Paul Suhey admits relieving Joe Paterno of his head coaching duties in November 2011 over a late-night phone call was not the right tact. Stephanie Deviney, another trustee, is certain the whole board feels that way.“We apologize, we screwed it up as far as how we delivered the message,” Suhey said Friday in an interview. “Our decision, we’re not going to go back on. But we messed that up big time.“People are still so hurt by that, and you know, damn it, we screwed it up.”The Paterno decision will go down in the annals as the trigger of when Penn State alumni and diehard fans turned against the board, and the anger has not relented. They email the trustees, write letters — even call them out in advertisements in this newspaper. But, four trustees, in an interview with the Centre Daily Timeseditorial board, said they are committed to turning the corner, opening up and building on the progress the university has already seen in responding in the wake of the Jerry Sandusky abuse scandal. The trustees — Suhey, Deviney, board Chairman Keith Masser and Paul Silvis — said they hope the university community will meet them in the middle as part of moving forward.

Editor note:  It took them a year and a half to say this?? Shame, shame, shame on them.

Read more here: http://www.centredaily.com/2013/03/10/3532643/penn-state-trustees-were-trying.html#storylink=cpy

for more information on John Surma‘s role in destroying Joe Paterno, go to:

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-931816

School president to make statue call–contact Rodney Erickson–save the statue


The decision whether to remove or move the Joe Paterno statue from outside of Beaver Stadium is expected to be made by Penn State president Rodney Erickson within 72 hours, a source familiar with Erickson’s plans told “Outside the Lines.” What to do about the statue has been a highly emotional topic among administrators and the board of trustees, sources said Friday. Much of the discussion has centered on how the NCAA will interpret whatever decision is made about the statue, sources said. SportsNation: Joe Paterno’s Statue? Joe Paterno’s statue remains for now, but Penn State may make a decision on its future soon. Should they remove it? Comment and vote! Trustees told “Outside the Lines” the board had a spirited discussion about the statue in a conference call Thursday night — the same call in which the resignation of former board chairman Steve Garban was discussed. But the decision is not theirs, they said. Various tweets Friday morning said the board had voted and/or made a decision about the statue and that it would be removed this weekend. However, if the board had taken a vote during the call, it would have violated state law, which prohibits votes from being taken outside of declared board meetings. The trustees who spoke Friday morning said board members did discuss possibilities for the statue, including moving it from the stadium area, perhaps to the library on campus that bears the Paterno name, or the Penn State All Sports Museum near the stadium. Board spokesman David LaTorre declined to comment Friday morning. Paterno’s wife, Sue, visited the statue Friday, along with her son, David, and daughter, Mark Kay Hort. Former Penn State All-American and Paterno supporter Franco Harris also stopped at the statue. The trustees have been concerned this week that the NCAA will hand down an extreme punishment, possibly the death penalty for the football program, for the school’s “loss of institutional control” in the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal. Dealing with the statue issue, and the resignation of Garban, was needed to show the public the board was serious about “moving forward,” one trustee said. “It’s a highly sensitive decision,” another trustee said Friday. “The decision is a symbolic one. We have to be very careful about what kind of message we send.” According to one trustee, board members also are concerned about how the NCAA might view the board’s decision in 2004 not to take a vote on a sweeping set of reforms that would have strengthened the board’s oversight power over the university president and other campus leaders, including Paterno. “Outside the Lines” detailed that decision in a story this week. The trustee said members are concerned that the decision to pass on such reforms might play into a potential NCAA charge of a “loss of institutional control” at Penn State. Sources told “Outside the Lines” last week the trustees had wanted to keep the statue standing at least for the time being. The trustees’ reluctance to remove the statue was motivated in part by a desire not to offend alumni and students who adore the late coach, despite the findings of his role in the Sandusky cover-up detailed in the Freeh report, the sources said. “You can’t let people stampede you into making a rash decision,” a trustee said last week. “The statue represents the good that Joe did. It doesn’t represent the bad that he did.” One board member told “Outside the Lines” Friday morning: “People want to kick Joe’s bones … it’s outrageous.” Since the Freeh report was released last week, former coaches, commentators and members of the public have demanded the Paterno statue be torn down immediately. Some also have called for the removal of Paterno’s name from the university library; the Paterno family donated more than $4 million to the university. Last weekend, a campus security guard stood a few paces from the Paterno statue outside Beaver Stadium, keeping watch for would-be vandals. This week, a few students camped out around the statue to ensure it would not be vandalized after a plane flew over the campus Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday with a banner that read: “Take the statue down or we will.” More than a decade ago, the 7-foot statue was commissioned by a group called “Friends of Joe and Sue Paterno,” comprised of about 35 trustees, some of whom are still on the board, and deep-pocketed university benefactors. The group hired a Reading, Pa., artist named Angelo Di Maria, 65, to sculpt it. The statue was then bequeathed to the university, a trustee briefed on the arrangements said Friday night. Two trustees who contributed to the statue’s cost are Ed Hintz and Jim Broadhurst, both of whom were notified in May 2011 by then-president Graham Spanier at a private dinner about the Sandusky matter, according to the Freeh report. Both men have denied that Spanier told them about the investigation, but some of their fellow trustees said this week they do not believe them. Among the other trustees who helped pay for the statue: Al Clemens and Ira Lubert.